What is it like to study architecture at the Kraków University of Technology? Magdalena Raźny shares her experience

18 of June '26

#Architectural Education in Poland_Architecture Departments

Where can you study architecture in Poland? Which university should you choose? We asked students and recent graduates of Polish universities about what studying architecture is like—what works, what poses a challenge, and what could be improved. Magdalena Raźny told us about what it’s like to study architecture at the Krakow University of Technology.

Magdalena RAŹNY— a graduate of the architecture program at the Krakow University of Technology. Her interests center on public architecture and the design process, understood as a dialogue between space, the user, and the context of a place. During student exchange programs in Germany and Portugal, she had the opportunity to learn about diverse approaches to design. She is passionate about travel, discovering new places, and art, all of which inspire her creative approach to architecture.

I studied architecture at the Kraków University of Technology. During my studies, I had the opportunity to participate in two Erasmus exchange programs—in Germany and Portugal—which significantly influenced my perception of architectural education and prepared me for my future career.

My studies at the Kraków University of Technology provided me with a solid theoretical and technical foundation. The program was demanding and intensive, which required a high degree of independence, good time management, and the ability to work under time pressure. Working on multiple projects simultaneously taught me to take responsibility for my own creative process and to be consistent in my design decisions. Another key aspect of my education was the instructors’ emphasis on ensuring that projects complied with applicable regulations and architectural guidelines, which helped me better understand the realities of professional practice and the responsibilities associated with the architectural profession.

I found the classes on computer-aided design techniques particularly valuable; during these sessions, we learned about the digital tools used in the design process, including BIM-based software. The ability to work in this type of environment proved very useful for my further professional development.

However, the design courses sparked my greatest interest, especially those focused on public architecture. Working on buildings with complex functions allowed me to better understand the design process, the relationship between the user and the space, and the importance of clear functional solutions. Courses of a historical nature, on the other hand, were less important to me, although they served as an important complement to the curriculum.

Classes in Germany were more formalized and based on clearly defined grading criteria. However, the relationships with instructors were more collaborative, and students had greater influence over the course of their studies, including the ability to choose courses according to their own interests.

In contrast, my studies in Portugal were characterized by a greater emphasis on teamwork. Most projects were carried out in groups, which fostered collaboration and the exchange of ideas. Working in project teams allowed for a better understanding of the dynamics of the design process and the importance of communication and compromise. This experience proved particularly valuable, as architects rarely work independently in their professional careers—day-to-day practice in architectural firms relies on collaboration among specialists from various fields.

Comparing these experiences, I believe that studies in Poland offer a high level of technical expertise, while programs abroad effectively develop soft skills and teach a flexible approach to the design process. Combining both perspectives provides a broad and practical preparation for the profession of architecture.